It’s Monday morning. You’re clearing weekend email when your inbox lights up: a subpoena for customer data. Ugh—now what? You know there are limits on what can be disclosed and how—but where do those limits live and how should you put them into practice? Welcome to the Stored Communications Act.
The Stored Communications Act (SCA) At A Glance
The Stored Communications Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2701–2713, is the federal framework for when providers of electronic communications and remote computing services may (or must) disclose user content and non-content records. At a high level:
- Providers generally may not voluntarily disclose content, with narrow exceptions (18 U.S.C. § 2702(a)–(c)).
- The government’s ability to compel data depends on the data type, the legal instrument it uses, i.e., a warrant vs. a subpoena, and whether the government has provided prior notice to the subscriber (18 U.S.C. § 2703(a), (d)).
- Providers are required to provide non-content data regarding the subscriber to a government authority, e.g., name, address, telephone records, length and types of service, and source of payment (18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)(2).
- Courts can delay user notice via a non-disclosure order, but those orders must meet statutory predicates (18 U.S.C. § 2705(a)–(b)).
The sheer number of variables at play in the SCA makes compliance complicated, to say the least. Here are ten practical steps to working through it without ruining your week.
The Stored Communications Act In Practice
1) Start a response log and plan.
To start, create a one-page, privileged working document noting the basics of the request: the agency, the deadline, the customer/subscriber at issue, and any other key elements of the request. Figure out who the customer or individual at issue is and how they relate to your company. Create a table listing each request, what you are likely to have, and how you think you might respond. This document will be your source of truth as you work up your response.
2) Analyze who sent the request: government vs. civil litigant.
It matters whether the request is from the government or a private litigant. At a high level:
- Government requests (warrant, court order, subpoena): These fall under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2702–2705. In short, the government can compel the production of certain data depending on the instrument and category of data.
- Civil subpoenas/private litigation: The SCA generally restricts disclosure of content to private parties (18 U.S.C. § 2702(a)(1)–(2)). Courts routinely reject attempts to compel providers to produce user communications in civil discovery. The standard move is to object to the subpoena, cite the SCA, and (if appropriate) direct the litigant to the customer instead.
3) Determine what type of legal process you received.
Assuming you’re dealing with a government request, figure out whether it is a subpoena, a court order, or a search warrant and who issued it (grand jury, agency, court). The document type controls what can be compelled under the SCA. As a default rule, warrants reach content (messages, files), while subpoenas are usually limited to basic subscriber records (name, address, service dates, payment method) (18 U.S.C. § 2703(a) for content; § 2703(c)(2) for basic subscriber records).
4) Preserve your data.
Determine what internal data needs to be held for the specific accounts, services, and date ranges. Make sure any auto-deletion rules are turned off so that relevant data is retained.
5) Map the requests and analyze the substance under Stored Communications Act requirements.
Classify each request as content (messages, documents, files, in-app notes) or non-content (subscriber info, login IPs, device IDs, session times), which is a key concept under the Stored Communications Act. Build a quick system-by-system inventory—tracking your determination on your response log.
Once you’ve done that, apply the matrix:
- Content → requires a search warrant.
- Basic subscriber information → a subpoena is typically sufficient.
- Any other non-content records (e.g., IP logs not listed above) → often requires a warrant or a court order based on “specific and articulable facts” (18 U.S.C. § 2703(d)).
6) Confirm user notice and any non-disclosure order.
If the government proceeds without a warrant, notice to the user is usually required under the Stored Communications Act unless a court orders otherwise via a non-disclosure order. You should always review any court order to confirm the scope and duration, and to calendar the expiration.
7) Narrow scope and reduce burden.
Once you’ve mapped the requests and have a sense of what you have and how you plan to respond, call the issuer to make sure you narrow the scope to what is truly necessary and relevant to the investigation. If the request as drafted would be overly burdensome or voluminous, document the burden and propose targeted alternatives or a phased approach leveraging things like date ranges, custodians, product modules and standardized reports. Track and memorialize all agreements in your log.
8) Consider cross-border and third-party issues.
Flag conflicts with foreign law for non-U.S. customers and discuss potential solutions with the requester. It’s possible that non-U.S. laws (e.g., privacy laws) may restrict what you can or should do with data about users in those regions. Often, U.S. agencies have limited interest in data about non-U.S. individuals and you may be able to negotiate a phased approach that first focuses on the U.S.
9) Validate emergencies and national security requests.
If an agency claims disclosure is required due to an emergency (danger of death or serious injury), require written representations and limit disclosure to what is necessary.
10) Produce securely.
Once you’ve settled on a production plan, collect and produce using proper e-discovery practices. Include a cover letter documenting any scope agreements, limitations, or objections. Preserve a clear written record of what you produced and why.
Create A Stored Communications Act Procedure
I never like to do the same thing twice. Once I think through an issue and build a system that works, I document it in a way that is easy to digest, is actionable, and is available to anyone who needs it. Create a documented procedure that works for your organization and keeps your subpoena responses within the requirements of the Stored Communications Act.
Don’t get caught flat footed on that Monday morning subpoena. Think through your position on requests that seek subscriber information and adopt a consistent, defensible position.
Further reading: 18 U.S.C. §§ 2702, 2703, 2705; United States v. Warshak, 631 F.3d 266 (6th Cir. 2010).
This post is for general informational use only. This is not legal advice and does not form an attorney-client relationship. For any specific situation, you should seek out legal representation and counsel.
Portions of this blog may constitute attorney advertising. Any testimonial or endorsement on this profile does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each representation.
